Cryptologic_Mafia


Latest articles in Never do business with Cryptologic Inc.
 
Biggest Mafia, Junk & Crooks In The Gambling Industry
Voted by this magazine for 2002 Cryptologic Inc. & Intercasino...
 
No Time Left For Cryptologic
Time is fast running out for the Cryptologic crooks. They have very little time left to prepare a statement of defense as required ...
 
$100,000 Reward To Get Andrew Rivkin And Mark Rivkin In Jail
This is a reward for information leading to the arrest and criminal conviction of Andrew Rivkin and Mark Rivkin, founders ...
 
Cryptologic Inc. Sued Again For US $ 293 Million - Part 1
Cryptologic Inc., better known as the MAFIA of online gaming is sued for breach of contract, misrepresentation...
 
Cryptologic Inc. Sued Again For US $ 293 Million - Part 2
On or about August 15, 2001, after a meeting between the parties, Cryptologic presented Websports with a Letter of Intent which ...
 
Cryptologic Inc. Sued Again For US $ 293 Million - Part 3
From and after the date that the First Letter of Intent was entered into, and from and after the date that the Agreement was entered ...
 
Cryptologic Inc. Sued Again For US $ 293 Million - Part 4
Unbeknownst to the Plaintiff at the time, the Defendant, Cryptologic, and others unknown to the Plaintiff but known...
 
Bad News For The Crooks At World Gaming Plc And Cryptologic
American lawmakers are now considering regulating online gaming instead of banning it. And guess what? ...
 
Stay Away From Cryptologic, World Gaming, Starnet, Sportingbet
A few weeks ago we reported how an experienced player lost thousands playing Let It Ride with the rigged Cryptologic software...
 
The Cryptologic Major Fraud
A Cryptologic licensee using their junk software complained to our magazine how Cryptologic was cheating...
 
Cryptologic The Crooks Going Down The Toilet!
The Cryptologic crooks are reeling from the biggest blow yet. Standard and Poor's has announced it will dump a number ...
 
Cryptologic Overdue For A Police Raid
A number of readers have asked how come Cryptologic didn’t get raided by the police. There is no doubt that they are heavily ...
 


You are here: home > never do business with cryptologic inc. > new jersey sues another eight internet betting sites

Posted Sunday, January 8, 2006

New Jersey Sues Another Eight Internet Betting Sites
New Jersey Sues Another Eight Internet Betting Sites. The State Of New Jersey...

 

New Jersey Sues Another Eight Internet Betting Sites. The State Of New Jersey Has Broadened Its Attack On Internet Gambling With Additional Lawsuits.

The State of New Jersey has broadened its attack on Internet gambling with additional lawsuits filed Tuesday against eight sites, including some of the biggest names in the business.

New Jersey Attorney General John J. Farmer Jr. announced that the divisions of Gaming Enforcement and Consumer Affairs “filed civil actions against several Internet based sports betting operations for acting in violation of New Jersey law by accepting wagers from individuals, including minors, located in New Jersey.”

The defendants, and their bases of operations, are: 2betdsi.com (Diamond Sportsbook International), Costa Rica; InterCasino.com, Dominica; Laythepoints.com (SBG Global Sportsbook), Costa Rica; Sportingbet.com, Alderney; Sportsbook.com, Costa Rica; Intertops.com, Antigua; BetonSports.com (NASA Sportsbook International), Costa Rica; and Betmill.com (Millennium Sports), Costa Rica. In July, Sportingbet.com bought the parent company of Sportsbook.com.

Robert Williams, marketing director of Diamond Sportsbook, told RGT Online tonight that his company has not seen the suit, and was surprised to read about it on a Web site. He said Diamond made no effort to target New Jersey for advertising, and had not run a billboard there.

“We advertise all over North America,” Williams said. “We’re in every publication, like everybody else -- the sports annuals, the betting guides, as well as customers that we would mail to.”

Asked if Diamond has customers in New Jersey, he said, “Every sports book has customers in New Jersey.”

The other defendants could not be reach tonight, or the people who could speak for the companies were not available.

In a press release, New Jersey officials said state investigators logged on to the Web sites and placed wagers on athletic events. They said there were few, if any, safeguards to prevent minors with access to credit cards from betting.

“The citizens of New Jersey need to be aware that these sports betting operations are not regulated and they are illegal,” John P. Suarez, the director of the Division of Gaming Enforcement, said in a statement. “Regardless of their occasional claims of ‘licensing’ and ‘legality’, they answer to no one and are therefore not held to the same scrutiny as our Atlantic City casinos.”

In June, New Jersey sued three online casinos that were not nearly as prominent as this week’s defendants – 7Sultans.com, Royalclubcasino.com and Alohacasino.com. A spokesman for the attorney general had no information today on what’s happened in those cases.

All three of te June defendants had advertised on billboards in or near Atlantic City. According to a story in The Press of Atlantic City, advertising also brought this week’s defendants to the attention of state officials.

The Press said one of the eight defendants had bought billboard space in the Atlantic City area, another advertised on radio and another sent a mailer to the post office box of the Attorney General himself.

Both the June cases and the new ones are civil, not criminal, and were filed in Mercer County Superior Court. The state is asking the court to prohibit the defendants from accepting bets from individuals in New Jersey, account for all money won from New Jersey residents in the last year, and require the defendants to “restore any money or property acquired by means of an alleged unlawful practice.”

New Jersey is doing more than filing suits, however. It’s going after the providers of the sites’ phone services and, reportedly, credit card companies. In the press release, Suarez said, “We have written cease and desist letters to the telephone companies that provide toll-free services to these illegal Internet sites. Under federal law, the telephone companies will be required to comply with our demand.”

Herb Greenberg, a columnist for RealMoney.com, said in a column posted this afternoon that a spokeswoman for Attorney General Farmer said that if this week’s suits are successful, the “next step” would be to go after credit card companies “for facilitating illegal activity.”

Greenberg also implied that CryptoLogic, a major software developer, was one of the defendants. But Ronald George, a spokesman for Farmer, said he thought that CryptoLogic was mentioned in the complaint against InterCasino, but that CryptoLogic was not sued. The only defendants, he said, are the eight sites listed in the release.

CryptoLogic owns the InterCasino trade name. The company has said that InterCasino is one of the largest online casinos, and that together with two affiliated sites, accounted for 75 percent of CryptoLogic’s revenue last year.

If CyrptoLogic did get into trouble with New Jersey authorities, the repercussions could be serious. CryptoLogic is trying to get its software approved by regulators in two strict jurisdictions – Australia and the Isle of Man. It also hopes to eventually be approved by Nevada, if and when that state licenses Internet gambling.

Regulators in such jurisdictions often refuse to license an applicant for a gaming license who has previously violated laws, even in other jurisdictions.



  e-mail E-mail this page   print Printer-friendly page


CRIME REWARD of $5,000,000 to get the Cryptologic crooks in jail. Get the Cryptologic Inc. crooks in jail. There is a reward to "deliver" these crooks to the authorities so they can arrest them and throw them in jail. The crime reward for these Cryptologic thieves is $5,000,000 (five million American dollars) if arrested and convicted and jailed at the same time.
CryptologicMafia.com - You are authorized to reproduce the entire content of this site without our approval.
i